Human
beings communicate using words. For some of us lots and lots of words.
This
morning is Holy Trinity Sunday and through the centuries tomes have been
written to explain this doctrine of the church.
And although a lot of very smart people have spent lifetimes on the
subject, their descriptions fall short and are oft times accused of being close
to heresy. As musician Jon English wrote
– “Words are not enough.”
In
this morning’s Gospel, Nicodemus and Jesus are having a conversation about the
kingdom of God. Jesus says, “No one can see the kingdom of God without being
born from above,” and also, “No one can enter the kingdom of God without being
born of water and spirit. What is born of flesh is flesh. What is born of
Spirit is spirit.”
The
conversation between Jesus and Nicodemus is a multilayered story, pregnant with
possibility. Stepping aside from
traditional interpretations, this morning we are going to continue the
conversation begun in the season of Easter, where we have considered how to
tell the Gospel story, --- Jesus’ death and resurrection, God’s love---- to a
hurting world; exploring authentic and innovative ways to share the Good News.
When
I heard the conversation between Jesus and Nicodemus, “the flesh is flesh and
the Spirit is spirit,” I interpreted a dualism – two very different ways of being
and understanding: body vs. spirit, thinking vs. feeling, ... and a lack of
relationship between the two, other than they are on either end of a polarity. The
conversation is full of words, what might be called ‘heady’ phrases issued by
Jesus, thought provoking where Nicodemus -and of course ourselves- know we hear
something important, but, can’t quite grasp the fullness of the
explanation. To top that, Jesus used
‘heady’ phrases to talk about the heart, the feeling, the action of Spirit, who
is beyond words.
Although
the church has spent centuries discussing and arguing about the nature of God –
the doctrine of the Trinity- I would like to think that the discussion mirrors
that of Jesus: ‘heady’ phrases that emphasize the dualism human beings make
between using our heads and using our hearts. Perhaps the very idea of Trinity
is to draw out the polarity, so that in trying to work out the nitty-gritty of
the Trinity, the complex relationship of the Mystery has us give up and move to
heart and experience --- drawing us to the centre of the relationship where the
polarity crosses over.
Preacher
Claudio Carvalhaes explains God as Trinity where Trinity’s nature and character
is the relationship’s deep belonging and entanglements --- a very dynamic and
moving being and action - as is all relational living. Words are not enough to describe the fullness
of this relationship.
In
this place, where the polarity crosses over – where our heads and our hearts
converge, here, one finds a synergy, life, possibility. It is here that
language -words- are transformed.
The
kin-dom of God is experienced (flesh and spirit, in water and word, thinking
and feeling) in the language of art: poetry and spoken word; song lyrics and
music; drama, theatre, and dance; visual art in a plethora of mediums;
mathematical equations and coding.
Assistant
to the Bishop Rev. Doug Reble tells this story in his sermon for today:
The
story is told of a wealthy man, who commissioned Pablo Picasso to paint a
portrait of his wife. When the portrait
was completed, the man was shocked to see the image that had been created. “Why
that looks nothing like my wife. You should have painted her the way she really
is!” Picasso took a deep breath and said, “I’m not sure what that would be.”
Without hesitation, the man pulled out his wallet and removed a photograph of
his wife saying, “There, you see, this is how she really is! Picasso bending over, looked at it and
replied, “She is rather small and flat, isn’t she?”
Or
what of the famous portrait of Winston Churchill painted by Sutherland and given
to Churchill at a public ceremony in
Westminster Hall for his 80th birthday. Churchill felt the portrait to be terribly
unflattering; as the artist captured the fragility of age, a sternness, and a
look of disenchantment. So unimpressed
with it, Churchill did not display it – after his death his wife said that to
relief his frustration she had had it destroyed a couple of months after it was
painted.
Lutheran
theologian, Paul Tillich, wrote some very good theology about art – abstract
art – to be exact. There is ‘art’ from WWII , that are paintings that appear as
exact representations- draftsmen-like- of fighting war planes or navy vessels
for example; rendered in greys and blues, model-like, and flat. The works engage the head not the heart. This
was the point – the art recorded the war, while safely keeping feelings out of
it; in other words, bottled up never to be addressed. Like talking about the Trinity with words
alone, is keeping God talk in the realm of word and the head, so there is a
measure of control.
Tillich
describes the birth of abstract art as a counteresponse. All the pent-up
emotion (anxiety, PTSD, depression, conflict, change) post-war was painted out,
splatted, smeared, thrown, across canvasses. Emotion was up-chucked, spewed
out, and publicly displayed. Many spoke
out about their dislike for abstract art, their discomfort with the chaos, the
inability to make sense of the works of art. Tillich theologized that abstract work was the
post-war gospel, the Spirit at work. You see the chaos depicted -when looked
at- moved and had the observer FEEL the work, often agitating the fear and
anxiety within the onlooker; making the onlooker uncomfortable in their own
skin, as what the person was bottling up would come to the surface because they
were seeing how they felt. As one continued to engage with the abstract the
movement would lead the eye to a bright spot -HOPE- that carried off the canvas....the
abstracted caused a disruption that allowed the person to move -to be
changed... leaving the art the person returned to the world with options, a
heart and mind to experience and see resurrection, and possibilities for
healing and wholeness. A picture of the
Ultimate (that would be Tillich’s name and expression for God – rather than
Trinity); a picture of the Ultimate’s kin-dom come to life in relational living,
where head and heart converge so one can enter more fully into the Mystery of
God.
I
have learned a lot over the past month while writing and retelling Luke’s
version of the resurrection using words that begin with the same letter of the
alphabet. Pondering words, scouring the
dictionary, imputing words into an online thesaurus, to recreate the story has
brought the resurrection story to life and given my heart and brain innovative,
provocative, exciting, disturbing, and changing ways to enter the story. It’s in the dimensions, the nuances that the
story has infected me in a new way... and now is proclaimed as a new creation
--- abundant with meaning, purpose, and life. It is the same old story, but it
is not the same old story. To say that Jesus was murdered, martyred, rings in
my ears differently than the word crucified. To say that the Marys found Jesus
missing!.. has me experience the story in more depth.
I
suppose the sermon for today comes from a theme -read in blogs and talked about
on the radio- of there being an over all ‘flat’ feeling going around. COVID has many feeling that life is flat. Before COVID, and now even more through COVID,
many were feeling that church life, the story of the Gospel was flat – some of
us were too afraid to let that thought bubble to the surface. I think -I feel- that in regular time our
telling of the Gospel, our love for God, faith, hope, engagement with the
church and community was comfortable and lived more through our heads so we had
more control of the outcomes. Perhaps this abstract art titled ‘COVID’ has forced
us to move from our being too much in our heads and returned us to matters of
the heart.
I
have a memory of my dad being commissioned to do a watercolour painting of an
immaculately tended house, the sort where one would never find even a blade of
grass out of place on the front yard. Dad painted the house and included
(almost emphasized) the downspout of the rain gutter; the end of it looked like
the lawn mower had runover it; the man commissioning the work, asked dad to
redo it – on the next trip past the house the rainspout had been replaced. I
don’t remember if dad redid the painting – I remember him commenting that the
spout was the character that made the flat house come alive.
Our
bumps and bruises, our fears and foibles, our crazy ideas and creative
mannerisms, our gruffness and worries, our enthusiasm and untapped talents, our
approach to change, the things about us that endear us to others, the pieces
that annoy and grated on others around us, ... the things that make us
characters... these are the parts of us that are authentic and alive --- that
are the abstract ... the Spirit ... working to get us out of words alone,
because they are not enough. To be
un-flat, is to relish being in the convergence point of head and heart, in
relationship’s deep belonging centre where in the entanglement hope and
resurrection burst forth; that is where the mystery of Trinity dances and from
that revolving synergy creates the energy that is spewed across the canvas of the
world with healing for all.